July272014

ivoryandwines said: I wonder what's your problem with homeopathic treatments? Because afaik around here they are treated as legitimate options for people with medication allergies or when it just plain works reliably and has less sideeffects. I treat colds and throat inflamations (and other inflamations usually depending on severity) with apis in small doses and that's definitly homeopathic. It has never failed me. I treat half my minor ailments with herb teas. it's not like this is somethign I'd ask a [1/?]

the-real-seebs:

ivoryandwines:

the-real-seebs:

ivoryandwines:

the-real-seebs:

ivoryandwines:

whimsicalobservant:

Hmm, looks like there’s a difference in meaning here.

In Germany, homeopathic medicine is the catchall for stuff that is not 100% lab-grown afaik, or that’s what I got from the use of the word around these parts here.

I mean it’s a fact that there’s stuff in some plants that helps with some stuff.

(my gp prescribed some stuff with bee venom in it for my inflamed throat, worked like a charm)

(the ‘stuff with bee venom’ is apis. Potence D6, five globuli every [insert time period I forgot rn] btw you can dissolve that stuff in water and put it on external inflamations too. everything that comes from bees has inflammation curing properties.)

apparently the definition of homeopathy is ‘treat similar with similar’, so something that can cause some symptom in healthy people is used to treat an ailment of similar symptoms. However it at some point got ridiculous, when the guy who started it became obsessed with using toxic components in such littles doses that they could no longer be detected in the medication under the belief that it would pull out some weird ethereal magycks from the toxic components. Idk apparently he thought if you rub stuff while you dissolve it in ethanol it becomes suddenly more helpful. [Did I get that right? I’m unsure]

Idk I use D6 (1:1.000.000) for most things, that’s pretty standard even if it sounds little but since most of the stuff in pure form can kill it’s probably reasonable.

Before I read up on it I thought homeopathy is like ‘every medication made directly from nature stuff through distillation or other methods’ instead of ‘we made a thing in labs that can be used to treat this’.

Okay, so…

Is there a single double-blind study, anywhere, ever, supporting this claim?

Because if there’s an actual medical property here, then there ought to be. It’s not as though there’s any shortage of research budget to be had for things to reduce inflammations.

I currently do not have the 36 bucks to purchase the entire study buuuut apparently in 2002 they had some findings in relation to Rheumathoid Arthritis: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S002432050201617X

I am not actually at all proficient in science/medical jargon, so I’m not too sure what to google for. I just know my GP recommends apis 6X for throat inflammations and the doc I used to see as a kid did too. As I have no degree in medicine I do not feel in a position to argue with specialists.

I am comfortable with arguing with specialists when I have good evidence that their specialty is a fraud. Since in general there is very good evidence that the “like treats like” thing is not actually true, and there’s a lot of outright fraud in that industry, I am pretty distrustful.

I do love it when things have scientific studies about them that proof why they work. But I think some scientists don’t take ‘home remedies’ seriously enough to do extensive studies about them. Just because something hasn’t had a study performed about it doesn’t mean it cannot possibly work.

I don’t think there are any widely-known home remedies that haven’t been studied. Many, many, mainstream medications come from old home remedies like willow bark.

the-real-seebs:

ask for a ‘real’ treatment to fix them, but they are uncomfortable enough that I have to do something against them and when my GP recommends things and they work I’m not gonna question if it’s some fancy ‘real’ medicine or just a herbal tea. I’m not exactly sure why homeopathy when practiced by a professional and practiced within common sense should be turned down as a treatment option? honest question. [2/2]
Long story short: Because there is literally nothing to “homeopathy”. There’s some stuff that gets that name used for it that’s actually some kind of medicine, but “homeopathy” per se is based on the “and if you remove even more of it it works even better” theory.
Longer analysis.
Basically, there’s nothing that is identified as “homeopathy” that “works reliably” in the sense of “can be shown to work in clinical environments in double-blind tests”. So for the most part, the word means “charging people money and making medical claims that are completely baseless”.

Generations of housewives giving chamomile tea instead of some fancy medicine for tummy aches cannot be all that wrong. I don’t know if chamomile is scientifically proven to relief nausea and stomach aches. But I know it works at least for me (no matter how gross it tastes yeaugh).

I don’t know what of that is placebo-magic but herbal treatments for small illnesses have worked 700 years ago and they still work today.

But they can be all that wrong, sometimes. There’s been some history of well-accepted “home remedies” being really bad ideas. There’s a lot of errors you get if you haven’t got the habit of checking things out and keeping detailed logs.

For the record, chamomile has been scientifically tested as a remedy for various things. Check the citations for some..

Plenty of herbal remedies have been studied for actual effectiveness and the lack of such testing is, as seebs say, a gigantic red flag of bullshit.

June222014

misslucyjane:

edgebug:

monobeartheater:

arachnescurse:

Today I learned that the Curiosity sang itself ‘Happy Birthday’ on its year anniversary of being on Mars.

All alone.

Hundreds of thousands of miles from anyone or anything.

Guys I am depressed over robots now.

oh god this is the saddest thing i have ever read

Guys, shhh. No, this isn’t sad.

Curiosity isn’t hundreds of thousands of miles from anyone or anything. Curiosity has Spirit, Opportunity, Mars 3, Sojourner, Viking 1, and Viking 2 to keep him company on the red planet.

Opportunity is still exploring; Spirit, while still functional, is stuck in a crater, so cannot move around very much. The rest of them are quiet, asleep; old and beautiful and dignified in their silence

Curiosity sang Happy Birthday to himself and he had Spirit and Opportunity with him—and he had an entire planet down below to celebrate his life, his achievements, his brilliance

Curiosity sang Happy Birthday to celebrate an entire year of doing what he was designed to do; an entire year of exploring a planet on which he was not born, an entire year of roving and collecting information

an entire year of Mars becoming his home to share with his precursors, several of which are miraculously still doing their jobs (Opportunity was only expected to last 90 days; he’s lasted TEN YEARS)

it was a song of absolute euphoric joy, not one of loneliness

Curiosity is the exact opposite of lonely; he has hundreds of thousands of people down below who adore him, family at ground control to communicate with him constantly; and plenty of kin on the red planet’s surface to keep him company.

This is the exact opposite of sad.

(via charnanigans)

May312014
the-exercist:

fitblrholics:

If you look at the ingredients list and it’s a bunch of words you don’t even know… neither does your body (x)

Just like if you break apples and grapefruit down into their chemical components, I’m willing to bet that most people wouldn’t recognize the “ingredients” either. It’s a bunch of words you don’t even know:

Don’t use these scare tactics - Chemicals aren’t inherently bad. Literally everything is made up chemicals. Trust me, your body knows what niacin is. It knows how to digest fructose and calcium sulfate. Even if you only consume the most basic and “real” foods that are pulled directly off the vine, you’re still ingesting a series of chemical compounds that you probably can’t pronounce. That’s okay. 

Plus, it doesn’t hurt to learn what those words are. Ignorance is never a good reason for anything.

the-exercist:

fitblrholics:

If you look at the ingredients list and it’s a bunch of words you don’t even know… neither does your body (x)

Just like if you break apples and grapefruit down into their chemical components, I’m willing to bet that most people wouldn’t recognize the “ingredients” either. It’s a bunch of words you don’t even know:

image

Don’t use these scare tactics - Chemicals aren’t inherently bad. Literally everything is made up chemicals. Trust me, your body knows what niacin is. It knows how to digest fructose and calcium sulfate. Even if you only consume the most basic and “real” foods that are pulled directly off the vine, you’re still ingesting a series of chemical compounds that you probably can’t pronounce. That’s okay. 

Plus, it doesn’t hurt to learn what those words are. Ignorance is never a good reason for anything.

(via wyste)

May242014

wyste:

iguanafish said: I haven’t read this yet. What is the upkeep like on this kind of road? How much does said upkeep cost? I want to be optimistic but I shudder to think of potholes in solar panels.

It’s a modular hexagonal system, so damaged panels could be removed/repaired without causing integrity problems for the roads as a whole.

I’ve been doing some reading about cost myself this morning - their FAQ is a good place to start. http://www.solarroadways.com/faq.shtml

My impression right now is that their plan for the next phase of the project is sensible - hire professional material engineers to work on the manufacturing issues including keeping costs down, install some driveways and parking lots, move on to rural roads, with highways as a last step once things get smoothed out in the manufacturing process.

Cost calculations are complicated because they’re trying to combine various functions - keeping roads clear of snow, water runoff filtration, solar electricity generation, being a road, adding better night lighting, warning for animals in the road - so you can do a straight calculation from ‘installing road costs A, installing solar road costs B’ but it’s a little unfair. The straight calculation is: solar road costs more than asphalt road, maybe 50% more, right now. The 2009 version of the panels was $7000 a panel, but that number is five years old - they are coming out with new Phase 2 cost figures in July.

Semi-tangentially: while I haven’t read up on the technology myself, the fact that they are discrete hexagonal panels eliminates the possibility of pot holes.The majority of road damage (potholes, those big cracks, etc.) is caused by the expansion of water when it freezes in the winter. A smaller, but still significant amount of damage to the road surface (cracks, unevenness, etc.) is caused by heavy vehicle wear, like shipping trucks.

The hexagonal panels would not be damaged by the former because the expansion of freezing water could just push the panels away from each other, so the only damage to the panels themselves that you would need to worry about would be the latter - and that only if you’re going to put them on major highways. I don’t expect that they’re intending to do that until very late stages of implementing them on a national scale.

Now, I don’t know how the materials they’re using compare in durability to asphalt, so it may be that they wear down faster. I’d say that means they’d cost more to maintain, but it would require a complex cost comparison of usage wear vs. weathering which I don’t have nearly enough information on any side to make even a wild estimate.

March22014

simonjadis:

daftlypunk:

"im writing a research paper so reblog if—"

no youre not

image

(via goldentilde)

December122013
ayearofhibernation:


skandolous:
Ink Calendar designed by Oscar Diaz. The ink will slowly color each day of the month as time passes by.

literally the coolest fucking thing i’ve ever seen.
EVER.

I wonder if the material accounts for differences in ambient temperatures and humidities to keep the timing roughly accurate?

ayearofhibernation:

skandolous:

Ink Calendar designed by Oscar Diaz. The ink will slowly color each day of the month as time passes by.

literally the coolest fucking thing i’ve ever seen.

EVER.

I wonder if the material accounts for differences in ambient temperatures and humidities to keep the timing roughly accurate?

(via akillees)

August122013

bloggish:

how the hell did we get the idea pink isn’t a cool colour

because scientifically speaking pink doesn’t even exist; it fits between violet and red on the spectrum but actually what goes there is infrared and ultraviolet and all those things we can’t see

pink is the ambassador of an otherworldly and unknowable realm it is the most badass colour out there

I keep seeing this kind of thing floating around and it makes me want to claw at my hair and scream in incoherent frustration every time.

  1. Between violet and red on the electromagnetic spectrum is THE ENTIRE VISIBLE LIGHT SPECTRUM. Not pink. Not infrared or ultraviolet. Definitely not radio or x-rays. The longest (or lowest) visible wavelengths are red, which go into infrared (infra = below, red = red). The shortest (or highest) visible wavelengths are violet, which go into ultraviolet (ultra = above, violet = violet). Above red you get the oranges, then the yellows, then the yadda yadda until you reach the violets.
  2. Not all colors can be defined as a single wavelength on the visible light spectrum. MOST colors we see in the world aren’t. The majority of colors you see are formed by a combination of different reflected or emitted wavelengths. If you just have one wavelength, you’ve got a laser.
  3. Pink, in the sense we consider the color and in the absolute most over-simplified terms, is a combination of red and violet wavelengths - or, depending on your definition of pink, may even be a range of violets. It is not “between” them.

Okay? Okay.

I mean look, I am all for colors not being societally prejudiced against, but this pseudo-scientific bullshit I keep seeing like “OOOOOO WOW LOOK HOW SPECIAL PINK IS BECAUSE IT’S AN ~IMAGINARY COLOR~” or this one here about pink being, I don’t know, real-life octarine?? is just…

If you’re going to use science to make things cool then make sure you understand what you’re talking about first. Please. Otherwise you’re just spreading misinformation and misleading people and that’s rude.

(via kissofjudas)

May142013
squigglydigg:

notnights:

What the heck is that Is that a horse shoe

That’s Omega!  It stands for “ohm,” which is a measure of electrical resistance.

And the answer is B!
It’s like having two holes in a bucket: smaller resistance is a bigger hole, because less is blocking the current (that’s what resistance means: resisting current, like an insulator). Water flows out through the bigger hole faster than through the smaller hole; more current flows through the weak resistor than the strong resistor.
If they were hooked up in series, i.e. one after another on the same stretch of the circuit, they would have the same current.

squigglydigg:

notnights:

What the heck is that
Is that a horse shoe

That’s Omega!  It stands for “ohm,” which is a measure of electrical resistance.

And the answer is B!

It’s like having two holes in a bucket: smaller resistance is a bigger hole, because less is blocking the current (that’s what resistance means: resisting current, like an insulator). Water flows out through the bigger hole faster than through the smaller hole; more current flows through the weak resistor than the strong resistor.

If they were hooked up in series, i.e. one after another on the same stretch of the circuit, they would have the same current.

(Source: notnights)

May42013
Mathematical equations derived by scientific studies for describing the shape of a ponytail.
Ladies, gentlemen and sundry: science.

Mathematical equations derived by scientific studies for describing the shape of a ponytail.

Ladies, gentlemen and sundry: science.

April242013
the-fandoms-are-cool:

vhanstiel:

girlatsunrise:

doppelrahmstufe:

(via via bg4Po.jpg 496×672 pixels)

WE FOUND IT.
WE FOUND BETELGEUSE FIVE.

Remember when we read about touchscreen and ebook before those things exist? Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to find myself a nice towel.

HOLY ZAPHOD BEEBLEBROX SOMEBODY GET ME A THUMB A BEER AND SOME PEANUTS I’M NOT GONNA BE HERE WHEN THE WORLD ENDS

I hate to be That Guy but Kepler-22b is nowhere near Betelgeuse. Sorry guys…

the-fandoms-are-cool:

vhanstiel:

girlatsunrise:

doppelrahmstufe:

(via via bg4Po.jpg 496×672 pixels)

WE FOUND IT.

WE FOUND BETELGEUSE FIVE.

Remember when we read about touchscreen and ebook before those things exist? Now if you’ll excuse me, I need to find myself a nice towel.

HOLY ZAPHOD BEEBLEBROX SOMEBODY GET ME A THUMB A BEER AND SOME PEANUTS I’M NOT GONNA BE HERE WHEN THE WORLD ENDS

I hate to be That Guy but Kepler-22b is nowhere near Betelgeuse. Sorry guys…

(via bibliophage413)

← Older entries Page 1 of 6